The Bladensburg Peace Cross was erected in 1925 on public land as a tribute to the lives of 49 soldiers from the local area who died in World War I. Certain atheistic groups filed suit in federal court, arguing that the cross violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. The district court dismissed the case under the tests set forth in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), and used in the Ten Commandments monument case of Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005). The Fourth Circuit reversed, holding that the cross had to come down. In American Legion v. American Humanist Assoc., the Court held 7-2 that the cross can stay. Justice Alito’s lead opinion held that “the passage of time . . . gives rise to a strong presumption of constitutionality,” and thus the fact that the cross had been in place for 89 years before being challenged weighed against it being an unconstitutional support of religion by the state. Over time, the cross became more aligned with the secular purpose of honoring veterans than furthering Christianity, and to remove the cross now would signal an animosity toward religion, which is out of step with the ideals of respect and tolerance embodied in the First Amendment. Justice Alito, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Kavanaugh, criticized the Lemon test’s applicability to cases like this one. Justice Thomas filed a concurrence stating his belief that the Establishment Clause should not be incorporated against the States, and would overrule the Lemon test in all contexts. Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the challengers to the Cross lacked standing, since “offended observers” do not suffer an injury-in-fact. Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Kagan, also concurred, stating that there is no single formula for resolving Establishment Clause challenges, and the Cross here passed muster because of its secular motives and lack of any disparagement toward any group. Justice Kavanaugh filed a concurrence to note that the Court has shelved the Lemon test, and that those who object to the Cross can still petition the state government to remove it, as the Court’s decision does not force Maryland to maintain it. Justice Kagan also filed a concurrence to state that she still finds the Lemon test useful, despite the majority’s decision to discard it. Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sotomayor, dissented, arguing that the Cross by its nature impermissibly elevates Christianity over other faiths. A link to the opinion is here.
SCOTUS Opinion: Court Permits The Bladensburg Peace Cross To Remain Standing
Contributors
- Christine Bondi
- Nathan J. Bresee
- Susan Knell Bumbalo
- Arthur D. Burger
- David H. Cox
- Crystal S. Deese
- Pamela J. Diedrich
- Christopher P. Ferragamo
- Christopher A. Glaser
- Sarah E. Godfrey
- Peter J. Jenkins
- Roy L. Kaufmann
- David L. Kelleher
- Robert N. Kelly
- Caroline Y. Lee-Ghosal
- Erica L. Litovitz
- John J. Matteo
- Selena A. Motley
- David A. Rahnis
- Adam W. Smith
- Brian W. Thompson
- Kristen C. Vine
- Mitchell B. Weitzman
Categories
- COVID-19 (51)
- Diversity and Inclusion (5)
- Video Content (5)
- The Women's Initiative (2)
- Education (2)
- Court Case (199)
- Supreme Court (252)
- Litigation (129)
- News (179)
- General Litigation & Trial Practice (174)
- Real Estate (110)
- Tax Law (30)
- Business Law (32)
- DC Laws (21)
- Professional Responsibility (20)
- Business and Tax Law (21)
- Health Law (37)
- Taxes + IRS (20)
- Legislation (15)
- Employment Law (24)
- Insurance Coverage (28)
- Virginia Supreme Court (12)
- Tenant Rights (8)
- Maryland Courts (21)
- MD Appeals (11)
- DC Court of Appeals (8)
- DC Zoning (7)
- Foreclosure (6)
- Trusts & Estates (10)
- Uncategorized (6)
- bankruptcy (6)
- Condos and Coops (7)
- DC Recorder of Deeds (5)
- fair housing (4)
- Maryland Court of Special Appeals (7)
- Title Insurance (9)
- TOPA (4)
- Commercial Leasing (3)
- fair housing hoa (3)
- Montgomery County Maryland (3)
- Mortgage (2)
- Proposed Rules (2)
- Tax Sales (3)
- US. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (3)
- GCAAR (1)
- Judicial Foreclosure (1)
- Lis Pendens (1)
- Proposed Legislation (3)
Tags
Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton
Ake v. Oklahoma
Angel v. Commonwealth
bevins action
biologics
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009
biopharma
biosimilars
Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal.
condos
coops
DC
dc topa rights
DC Water
District Of Columbia Water And Sewer Authority
Emotional support animals
Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Equal Credit Opportunity Act
ERISA
facebook
FDA
First Amendment Law
First Amendment Protection
Graham v. Florida
Juvenile Punishment Standards
mental health
Microsoft Corp. v. Baker
museum square tenants association
Packingham v. North Carolina
patent holder
psychiatric assistance defendant cases
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
San Francisco City
scotus
September 11 Detainees
social media
Supreme Court
Supreme Court decisions
The Lanham Act
TOPA
Trademarks
U.S. Supreme Court
Virginia v. LeBlanc
Ziglar v. Abbasi
Archives
- October 2024 (2)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (5)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (3)
- August 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (3)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (5)
- November 2022 (6)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (8)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (3)
- October 2021 (5)
- September 2021 (5)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (11)
- June 2021 (26)
- May 2021 (11)
- April 2021 (14)
- March 2021 (11)
- February 2021 (8)
- January 2021 (2)
- December 2020 (13)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (20)
- May 2020 (17)
- April 2020 (24)
- March 2020 (14)
- February 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (3)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (7)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (31)
- May 2019 (13)
- April 2019 (11)
- March 2019 (18)
- February 2019 (12)
- January 2019 (10)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (4)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (35)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (5)
- March 2018 (13)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (5)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (4)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (15)
- April 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (7)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (5)
- January 2015 (2)
- November 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (2)
- April 2014 (2)